Email finder and verification tool popular in the GTM engineering community. Pay-per-use pricing model.
Email finder and verification tool popular in the GTM engineering community. Pay-per-use pricing model.
Email finder and verification tool popular in the GTM engineering community. Pay-per-use pricing model.
While LeadMagic shows promise in email enrichment and is integrated well within the Clay platform, users are facing notable challenges with data accuracy, billing confusion, and technical errors, leading to mixed feelings about its reliability.
LeadMagic is wired into Deepline. 12 actions are available out of the box, runnable from the CLI or as a column step in an enrichment spreadsheet.
Quick start
deepline enrich --input leads.csv --output leads.enriched.csv --with 'result=leadmagic_b2b_ads_details:{"ad_url":"{{ad_url}}"}' --jsonAvailable actions
Retrieving detailed metadata for a specific B2B ad creative
deepline enrich --input leads.csv --output leads.enriched.csv --with 'result=leadmagic_b2b_ads_details:{"ad_url":"{{ad_url}}"}' --jsonFinding B2B advertisers and ad-market activity
deepline enrich --input leads.csv --output leads.enriched.csv --with 'result=leadmagic_b2b_ads_search:{"company_domain":"example.com"}' --jsonSearching companies by ICP constraints
deepline enrich --input leads.csv --output leads.enriched.csv --with 'result=leadmagic_company_search:{"company_domain":"example.com"}' --jsonFinding competitor companies for an account
deepline enrich --input leads.csv --output leads.enriched.csv --with 'result=leadmagic_competitors_search:{"company_domain":"{{company_domain}}"}' --jsonFinding work email from name plus company domain
deepline enrich --input leads.csv --output leads.enriched.csv --with 'result=leadmagic_email_finder:{"first_name":"{{first_name}}","last_name":"{{last_name}}","domain":"example.com"}' --jsonValidating whether an email address is deliverable
deepline enrich --input leads.csv --output leads.enriched.csv --with 'result=leadmagic_email_validation:{"email":"{{email}}"}' --jsonFinding companies running Google Ads activity
deepline enrich --input leads.csv --output leads.enriched.csv --with 'result=leadmagic_google_ads_search:{"company_domain":"example.com"}' --jsonLow-cost preliminary signal for possible job changes; confirm with CrustData/PDL before acting
deepline enrich --input leads.csv --output leads.enriched.csv --with 'result=leadmagic_job_change_detector:{"profile_url":"{{profile_url}}","expected_company":"Example Corp"}' --jsonFinding companies running Meta Ads activity
deepline enrich --input leads.csv --output leads.enriched.csv --with 'result=leadmagic_meta_ads_search:{}' --jsonFinding mobile numbers for known contacts
deepline enrich --input leads.csv --output leads.enriched.csv --with 'result=leadmagic_mobile_finder:{"profile_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/example"}' --jsonFetching detailed professional profile context from a LinkedIn URL
deepline enrich --input leads.csv --output leads.enriched.csv --with 'result=leadmagic_profile_search:{"profile_url":"{{profile_url}}"}' --jsonFinding role-based contacts at target accounts
deepline enrich --input leads.csv --output leads.enriched.csv --with 'result=leadmagic_role_finder:{"job_title":"{{job_title}}","company_name":"Example Corp"}' --jsonReal quotes from 4 cited sources across review sites, blogs, Reddit, HN, X, and community forums.
“Email accuracy is solid — around 75-85% for US and European contacts according to user reports on G2. Credits range from $0.01 to $0.03 depending on the data type, and for a solo founder doing 500 email lookups per month, that is $5-15, which is hard to beat.”
“Platform is easy to implement and very easy to use, its very straight forward, it integrates with all our Outbound tech stack and we use it weekly for creating email campaigns.”
“The main limitations are no native CRM integration, no automated workflows, no buying signals, and single-source data without waterfall fallback. Every enrichment batch requires manual upload, download, and CRM import. Teams that grow beyond two to three SDRs typically outgrow the manual process.”
“LeadMagic's verified 97% email accuracy rate through real-time SMTP checks ensures every email is deliverable before you pay for it. But if you're looking for real-time behavior signals, LeadMagic often doesn't provide the level of signal granularity needed to prioritize outreach intelligently.”
Email finder and verification tool popular in the GTM engineering community. Pay-per-use pricing model.
Teams use LeadMagic for Best used for email enrichment in competitive industries where work emails are scarce, often supplemented by manual research, Effective for targeting local businesses in industries like HVAC, plumbing, and electrical by employing a combination of waterfalled enrichment tools, and Utilized for building multi-step enrichment strategies in Clay to manage and enhance customer contact databases with diverse data sources.
The cited source set leans positive, with 2 positive references out of 4. Deepline tracks 3 cited sources for this provider entry.
Encountering significant errors such as internal server errors and API rate limits when processing larger batches with LeadMagic, High similarity in names leads to increased confusion and errors in data, such as incorrect job titles being assigned (e.g., Forklift Driver vs. Marketing Director), and Unclear billing practices regarding credit consumption when no data is returned from enrichment attempts, causing frustration among users.
Teams commonly compare LeadMagic with Findymail for personal email searches and verification, Apollo for comprehensive lead sourcing and enrichment, and BetterEnrich for enhanced data at low pricing, especially for US-based numbers.
No vendor influence. Post anonymously or with your name.
4 questions reference this provider.
“...|----------------------|-------------------| | **C-Suite** | Cognism, LeadMagic, Lusha | 35-45% | | **VP/Director** | Cognism, ContactOut | 25-35% | | **Manager** | Cognism, Kaspr | 20-30%...”
“...ng enrichment | Can miss some invalids | Included in enrichment | | **LeadMagic** | Good accuracy | Can be expensive at scale | $0.01/email | **Recommended strategies:** - **For cold emai...”
“...----------|-------------------| | **C-Suite / Executives** | Cognism, LeadMagic, Lusha | 35-45% | | **VP / Director** | Cognism, ContactOut | 25-35% | | **Manager** | Cognism, Kaspr | 20-30...”
“...hese limited coverage regions. ## Additional Tools to Consider - **[LeadMagic](https://leadmagic.ai/)** — Strong Brazil-specific coverage - **Prospeo** — Additional coverage layer ## Ema...”
These public play pages include concrete inputs, outputs, workflow steps, and CLI instructions for running or forking a Deepline play.
Community discussions and reviews from the last 30 days.
LeadMagic reference from Kushal Magar, Founder of SyncGTM
Email accuracy is solid — around 75-85% for US and European contacts according to user reports on G2. Credits range from $0.01 to $0.03 depending on the data type, and for a solo founder doing 500 email lookups per month, that is $5-15, which is hard to beat.
LeadMagic reference from G2 verified reviewer
Platform is easy to implement and very easy to use, its very straight forward, it integrates with all our Outbound tech stack and we use it weekly for creating email campaigns.
LeadMagic reference from AutoTouch editorial
LeadMagic's verified 97% email accuracy rate through real-time SMTP checks ensures every email is deliverable before you pay for it. But if you're looking for real-time behavior signals, LeadMagic often doesn't provide the level of signal granularity needed to prioritize outreach intelligently.
All opinions are community-sourced from real GTM practitioners. No vendor can claim or edit this page.