Multi-source email finder that aggregates results from multiple databases. Competitive pricing.
Multi-source email finder that aggregates results from multiple databases. Competitive pricing.
Multi-source email finder that aggregates results from multiple databases. Competitive pricing.
Multi-source email finder that aggregates results from multiple databases. Competitive pricing.
Icypeas is wired into Deepline. 13 actions are available out of the box, runnable from the CLI or as a column step in an enrichment spreadsheet.
Quick start
deepline enrich --input leads.csv --output leads.enriched.csv --with 'result=icypeas_bulk_search:{"name":"{{name}}","task":"email-search","data":["{{data}}"]}' --jsonAvailable actions
Submit batch searches (up to 5,000 rows) for email-search, verification, or domain-search.
deepline enrich --input leads.csv --output leads.enriched.csv --with 'result=icypeas_bulk_search:{"name":"{{name}}","task":"email-search","data":["{{data}}"]}' --jsonEstimate matching company count before running paid find-companies. Free endpoint.
deepline enrich --input leads.csv --output leads.enriched.csv --with 'result=icypeas_count_companies:{}' --jsonEstimate matching profile count before running paid find-people. Free endpoint.
deepline enrich --input leads.csv --output leads.enriched.csv --with 'result=icypeas_count_people:{}' --jsonDiscover all email addresses associated with a domain or company name.
deepline enrich --input leads.csv --output leads.enriched.csv --with 'result=icypeas_domain_search:{"domainOrCompany":"{{domainOrCompany}}"}' --jsonFind a professional email for one person at a company. Async -- poll read_results for the final email.
deepline enrich --input leads.csv --output leads.enriched.csv --with 'result=icypeas_email_search:{"domainOrCompany":"{{domainOrCompany}}"}' --jsonVerify deliverability and validity of a single email address before outbound.
deepline enrich --input leads.csv --output leads.enriched.csv --with 'result=icypeas_email_verification:{"email":"{{email}}"}' --jsonSearch the company database with industry, headcount, location, and keyword filters.
deepline enrich --input leads.csv --output leads.enriched.csv --with 'result=icypeas_find_companies:{}' --jsonFind the LinkedIn company page URL from a company name or domain.
deepline enrich --input leads.csv --output leads.enriched.csv --with 'result=icypeas_find_company_url:{"companyOrDomain":"{{companyOrDomain}}"}' --jsonSearch 700M+ profiles with 16 filters for targeted prospecting. Use count-people first.
deepline enrich --input leads.csv --output leads.enriched.csv --with 'result=icypeas_find_people:{}' --jsonList and read bulk search file results and monitor batch progress. Free endpoint.
deepline enrich --input leads.csv --output leads.enriched.csv --with 'result=icypeas_read_bulk_files:{}' --jsonPoll and retrieve results for single or bulk async searches. Free endpoint.
deepline enrich --input leads.csv --output leads.enriched.csv --with 'result=icypeas_read_results:{}' --jsonScrape a LinkedIn company page for industry, size, location, and description.
deepline enrich --input leads.csv --output leads.enriched.csv --with 'result=icypeas_scrape_company:{"url":"{{url}}"}' --jsonScrape a LinkedIn profile for rich contact data including email, phone, and role details.
deepline enrich --input leads.csv --output leads.enriched.csv --with 'result=icypeas_scrape_profile:{"url":"{{url}}"}' --jsonReal quotes from 4 cited sources across review sites, blogs, Reddit, HN, X, and community forums.
“With a 79% email discovery success rate and 1.33% bounce rate, Icypeas significantly outperforms industry standards. The standout feature is the triple-verification technology — that 1.33% bounce rate has been independently validated by third-party benchmarks including Dropcontact's email finder comparison and Lobstr's API testing. For cold emailers, that low bounce rate protects sender reputation.”
“I spent months trying to get lead gen right. Claude Code finally made it work. Sourcing leads used to eat hours of my week — building lists, enriching them, verifying emails and checking quality. Icypeas handles email verification separately because Apollo's enrichment on its own is not that good. Layering Icypeas into the waterfall catches what Apollo misses.”
“Ultimate cold email checklist for 2026: Waterfall enrichment starting with Icypeas then Prospeo then BetterContacts then Findymail then FullEnrich. Double verify everything through BounceBan. Bounce rate under 2% before a single send. Icypeas sits first in the waterfall because its catch-all verification on Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 domains reduces unnecessary discards.”
“At $19/month, Icypeas is one of the cheapest paid options, and the real selling point is not just the price — credits never expire. The proprietary catch-all verification technology for Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 domains improves overall find rates by reducing contacts discarded unnecessarily. One caveat: testing showed mixed results across segments — excellent 85% accuracy in UK SMB but lower in US Enterprise — so validate on your specific ICP before scaling.”
Multi-source email finder that aggregates results from multiple databases. Competitive pricing.
Icypeas is tracked for Multi-source email finder that aggregates results from multiple databases. Competitive pricing.
The cited source set leans positive, with 4 positive references out of 4. Deepline tracks 4 cited sources for this provider entry.
Check coverage fit, integration surface area, data freshness, contract terms, and whether the provider matches the team's target accounts and regions.
No vendor influence — your review is published as-is. Post anonymously or with your name.
4 questions reference this provider.
“...search. Use either the "Enrich Person from Profile" enrichment or the Icypeas Profile Scraper integration, both of which will pull full LinkedIn profile data including all past positions...”
“...om their domain using third-party enrichment providers: ## Option 1: Icypeas 1. Add your company domain column 2. Add enrichment: **Icypeas** → Find Company Professional Profile (input:...”
“...ps://www.claygent.com)** - **[Leadmagic](https://leadmagic.ai)** - **[Icypeas](https://icypeas.com)** - **[Prospeo](https://prospeo.io)**”
“..."Enrich Company with Companies, People, Jobs" or "Enrich Company with Icypeas" which pull company descriptions and other profile details. [[documentation](https://docs.clay.com/en/article...”
Community discussions and reviews from the last 30 days.
Icypeas reference from Outreach Almanac
With a 79% email discovery success rate and 1.33% bounce rate, Icypeas significantly outperforms industry standards. The standout feature is the triple-verification technology — that 1.33% bounce rate has been independently validated by third-party benchmarks including Dropcontact's email finder comparison and Lobstr's API testing. For cold emailers, that low bounce rate protects sender reputation.
Icypeas reference from @thenicsilver
I spent months trying to get lead gen right. Claude Code finally made it work. Sourcing leads used to eat hours of my week — building lists, enriching them, verifying emails and checking quality. Icypeas handles email verification separately because Apollo's enrichment on its own is not that good. Layering Icypeas into the waterfall catches what Apollo misses.
Icypeas reference from @Seannywilson
Ultimate cold email checklist for 2026: Waterfall enrichment starting with Icypeas then Prospeo then BetterContacts then Findymail then FullEnrich. Double verify everything through BounceBan. Bounce rate under 2% before a single send. Icypeas sits first in the waterfall because its catch-all verification on Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 domains reduces unnecessary discards.
Icypeas reference from ColdEmailKit
At $19/month, Icypeas is one of the cheapest paid options, and the real selling point is not just the price — credits never expire. The proprietary catch-all verification technology for Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 domains improves overall find rates by reducing contacts discarded unnecessarily. One caveat: testing showed mixed results across segments — excellent 85% accuracy in UK SMB but lower in US Enterprise — so validate on your specific ICP before scaling.
All opinions are community-sourced from real GTM practitioners. No vendor can claim or edit this page.